跨考考研

跨考教育

当前位置: 跨考网 > 公共课 > 英语 > 真题 > 正文

2020考研英语一真题阅读理解text3原文

来源: 跨考教育

2019-12-23 14:23:08

手机考研网

收藏本文

  2020考研英语一考试已经结束,希望大家考的都不错,下面是为大家整理的2020考研英语一真题阅读理解text3原文,以供大家参考。

  Text 3

  Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

  A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

  Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

  The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

  The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

  But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

  The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

  Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

  Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

  Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

  31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

  [A] help little to reduce gender bias.

  [B] pose a threat to the state government.

  [C] raise women's position in politics.

  [D] greatly broaden career options.

  32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

  [A] It has irritated private business owners.

  [B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

  [C] It may go against the Constitution.

  [D] It will settle the prior controversies.

  33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

  [A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

  [B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

  [C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

  [D] the needlessness of government interventions.

  34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

  [A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

  [B] the objection to female participation on boards.

  [C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

  [D] the growing tension between labor and management.

  35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

  [A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

  [B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

  [C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

  [D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

  已经回归校园的你是不是突然间觉得有好多事情要做?月初发了大纲,月底就预报名了,时间不再像海绵里的水,再挤也不足以缓解焦虑了,尤其是考数三的同学,大纲过后就剩一片哀嚎,唯一能与之握手的就是法硕的小伙伴了。但是我们还是需要庆幸的,毕竟疯传英语要加入的听力最后证实是谣言,毕竟我们还有100天,百日冲刺还有机会力挽狂澜!

  这时候的你,不能目标再不清晰了,今年考研人数预计突破400w,明年会更多!无论是背水一战的决心,还是定能一战成硕的信心,只要今年考上都是幸运的!

  最后时刻,逆风翻盘?点击右侧咨询按钮,预约跨考专职老师为你助力。

  如有任何关于课程或复习方面的疑问,可点击页面右侧咨询按钮进行在线咨询,老师随时都在哦!

2021考研大纲&预报名
2021考研大纲解读
及难度评析
2021考研英语大纲新增词汇一览表 【跨考名师解析】2021管理类联考初数大纲全面解析!
2021考研数学一考试大纲与2020变化对比(高数部分) 2021乘风破浪 步步为营—从英语大纲论今年考研
2021考研数学三考试大纲(高数部分)考试内容和要求变化分析 【跨考名师解析】2021考研数学二考试大纲解析
2021考研预报名 考研总成绩是怎么算出来的?录取分数怎么算? 考研报名:2021考研预报名流程详解!
2021考研报名信息填写注意事项 建议收藏! 教育部官宣了:2021考研时间定了!
考研到底要花多少钱?快看各省市考研报名费! 非常重要!2021考研预报名注意事项大汇总!

分享到:

相关推荐

翻译硕士英语真题解析与习题详解

现货正版:24.9元...详情

最新版翻译硕士备考全攻略组合

欢乐畅读:71.9元...详情

跨考网| 考研信息网| 全国代理| 研招网| 关于我们| 加入我们| 联系我们 | 网站导航

跨考手机考研网:http://wap.kuakao.com/ 考研从未如此简单

Copyright@2004-2020 www.kuakao.com All Right Reserived 京 ICP备11041699号-3

版权所有:北京尚学硕博教育咨询有限公司