北京尚学硕博

教/育/咨/询/有/限/公/司

跨考教育

当前位置: 跨考网 > 公共课 > 英语 > 真题 > 正文

2020考研英语一真题阅读理解text3原文

来源: 跨考教育

2019-12-23 14:23:08

手机考研网

收藏本文

  2020考研英语一考试已经结束,希望大家考的都不错,下面是为大家整理的2020考研英语一真题阅读理解text3原文,以供大家参考。

  Text 3

  Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

  A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

  Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

  The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

  The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

  But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

  The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

  Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

  Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

  Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

  31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

  [A] help little to reduce gender bias.

  [B] pose a threat to the state government.

  [C] raise women's position in politics.

  [D] greatly broaden career options.

  32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

  [A] It has irritated private business owners.

  [B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

  [C] It may go against the Constitution.

  [D] It will settle the prior controversies.

  33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

  [A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

  [B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

  [C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

  [D] the needlessness of government interventions.

  34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

  [A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

  [B] the objection to female participation on boards.

  [C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

  [D] the growing tension between labor and management.

  35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

  [A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

  [B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

  [C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

  [D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

  在全民抗“疫”的大环境下,在宅在家就是为国家做贡献的时候,2021的考研学子该如何准备考研?跨考考研精英计划新升级,带你这样“开黑”:复刻实地教学模式,实现线下流程线上化,优秀师资在线讲解,班主任全程督学,预习、讲解、答疑、测试,作业及解答全程立体化复习,跨考考研——不论繁琐,不计投入,真像只有一个:要你学会!

  2021考研人已经粉墨登场,2020年考研报考人数已经较2019年净增了50万左右,按照近几年的趋势,2021年考研人数,保守估计都会达到380万,不提前准备起来还等什么~全年畅学已经在等待你的驾临!畅学小宠迫不及待的想和你一起打通考研任督二脉,升级战斗实力,一起披荆斩棘,彼此陪伴,让曲折变坦途!

  了解跨考考研新版精英计划领养畅学小宠,请点击页面咨询按钮

  查询各院校复试信息 了解历年分数线 请点击分数线

2021热门专业“NEI”幕曝光台
2021考研专业解读
及难度评析
2021考研整体难度解读 哪些专业不适合跨专业报考?
北上广深哪些院校比较好考 经济学专业解读及院校推荐
提分神器——考研政治该怎么复习 2/3都考研的临床医学该怎么选专业
2020考研临门一脚—查分/复试/调剂 考研总成绩是怎么算出来的?录取分数怎么算? 考研复试时,导师最爱问啥?
教育部对复试的规定和要求有哪些 复试常见注意事项还不够—你需要升级版
【实用】考研复试英语自我介绍模板 34所自主划线高校历年复试分数线(2012-2019)

分享到:

相关推荐

跨考网| 考研信息网| 全国代理| 研招网| 关于我们| 加入我们| 联系我们 | 网站导航

跨考手机考研网:http://wap.kuakao.com/ 考研从未如此简单

Copyright@2004-2020 www.kuakao.com All Right Reserived 京 ICP备11041699号-3

版权所有:北京尚学硕博教育咨询有限公司

 

全年集训

400-883-2220